Search Results for "peer review"
The theme for this year's Peer Review Week is "Peer Review and the Future of Publishing". We speak with Denisse Albornoz, Science Policy adviser in the ¸Û°Äͼ¿â’s Data team, about the policies that will likely evolve as AI technology continues to advance and its impact on scholarly publishing becomes more pronounced.
Matt Hodgkinson, Research Integrity Manager at the UK Research Integrity Office, gives us an overview on how AI tools are shaping the future of publishing, and how reviewers, authors and publishers can adapt to thrive in this changing landscape.
Peer Review and The Future of Publishing
publishingThe focus for this year's Peer Review Week is 'Peer Review and the Future of Publishing'. In this blog post, Senior Publishing Editor, Andrew Dunn, reflects on some of the less traditional and more forward-looking models of publication and peer review that we support.
Curious characters
history of scienceAnne McLaughlin finds wine experts, amateur magicians, chess masters and ichthyologists among the authors of scientific papers submitted to the ¸Û°Äͼ¿â.
Theme issue publishing at the ¸Û°Äͼ¿â
publishingLaunched in 1665, Philosophical Transactions is the longest-running scientific journal in the world. Since then, a lot has changed in scientific publishing, but the ¸Û°Äͼ¿â still strives to maintain integrity and trust in the research it publishes. The ¸Û°Äͼ¿â Publishing Editorial team explains how.
Recognition for reviewers
publishingIn our commitment to support peer review, we're highlighting the different ways that we reward and recognise the vital contributions that our reviewers make to the publishing process.
Rewarding peer review
publishingTo help recognise the vital contribution our reviewers make to the publishing process and to lower barriers to open access publication, Open Biology has introduced a reward scheme based on open access discounts starting January 2023.
Making peer review more inclusive and fairer: transparency, measurement and confrontation
publishingThis blog post highlights the steps we are taking to ensure our review process is inclusive, fair and transparent
Biology Letters and Proceedings A have now introduced optional Transparent Peer Review. We discuss what this means for our authors, reviewers and readers.
A few pointers for a good review
publishingProceedings B senior editor Professor Sarah Brosnan shares editorial experience and tips for helpful peer reviewing.
Are you co-reviewing?
publishingReviewing the work of colleagues has always been a vital part of an academic career. But how can you get involved in journal peer review when you are just starting your career?
Writing a review—the do’s and don’ts
publishingProceedings B Senior Editor Dr Maurine Neiman discusses the value of peer review and highlights the different elements to consider when writing a review report.